Autism Matters
  • Home
  • Training
    • Talks
    • Exploring Being Autistic
  • Blog
  • About
    • Caroline's published articles
  • Services
    • Training and CPD
    • Talks
    • Consultations >
      • Consultation enquiry
      • Consultation confirmation/payment
      • Family consultation confirmation/payment
    • Exploring Being Autistic
    • Employers
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Feedback

Does language affect our attitudes to autism?

8/1/2015

11 Comments

 
I was delighted by Ann Coffey’s stance in a Guardian article seeking to remove the term “child prostitute” from legislation to remove the implication that sexually exploited children are complicit in the abuse they suffer. This seems to me to be a necessary step in clearly defining what is actually happening and who is responsible for it.  Language is important – it both displays and helps us define our attitudes to that which it describes.

When my son was at school he used the word “gay” to describe anything or anybody he didn't like and vehemently denied that this was in anyway homophobic.  There was an abrupt turnaround in this attitude when I started using his name in this way; he became quite uncomfortable when anything negative was labelled “Samuel ” *.

So it is with autism; the stigma around the condition has led to the word having negative connotations.  I think the solution here is not to change the word but to address the stigma as it is cultural phenomenon that drives attitudes. For example negative attitudes to gay people gave rise in the 1980s to Section 28 an anti-gay provision,
thankfully subsequently repealed.  In my lifetime we have gone from homosexual acts being illegal to it being illegal to discriminate against people on the basis of their sexuality. 
This is a
seismic shift our culture – exactly what we need to happen in relation to autism.  I think using appropriate language is a good start.

So what is appropriate language?  I think it is quite simple really - call autistic people autistic people. Ditch the prefixes "high-functioning/low functioning" and “mild” and don’t initiate use of the outdated term Asperger’s syndrome to describe an autistic person who you find intelligent.  Unfortunately all these qualifiers and the ugly phrase “people with autism” are often used to describe autistic people, and (to my mind rubbing salt into the wound)  they are usually regarded by those using them as positive -  a softening of the dread term “autism”.  Actually the majority of autistic people prefer to be referred to simply as autistic people. This information has been available for some time, for example  Jim Sinclair wrote about this in 1999, but it seems to have passed some major autism charities** and legislation drafting officials
by.

Unfortunately autism is often seen as totally negative.  When I was interviewed by the Mail on Sunday for an article about my work, the reporter told me she could not mention my suspicion that my ex-partner might also be autistic because that could be libellous. Even medical professionals are not immune to this attitude – a woman who recently went to her GP seeking a diagnosis was asked “Why would a nice lady like you want a diagnosis like that?”.  

Given the prevalence of such attitudes it's easy to see how an alternative term for one of its trajectories (Asperger’s Syndrome) or a statement that the person is actually good for something (high functioning) could be considered positive - ways to soften the blow of autism.  However autism is not negative - it is a neurological atypicality which brings with it both strengths and challenges.  It is more like a constellation than a spectrum.  It does not move along one line going from low to high, it circles in many spheres, and one of its many facets is a tendency to extremes,  leading to the same individual being ‘high functioning’ in some areas and ‘low functioning’ in others.

Asperger’s Syndrome is not included the current edition of the DSM, the psychiatrists’ bible, and when it was the diagnostic criteria separating it from other forms of autism was the age of speaking, which is not a predictor of anything much (Einstein spoke at 4) but most people, even many health professionals are unaware of this.  I think it is fine for people who have a diagnosis of Asperger’s to stick with this when describing themselves, but for new diagnoses we don’t need to continue with the spurious division between slightly different autistic trajectories.

(Why autism should even be in the DSM, when it is not a psychiatric condition, is another whole debate which I won't go into here)

I find it sad that
many people feel obliged to say “people with autism”even though it doesn’t come naturally as an expression; I was particularly struck by a mother explaining how she had to stop herself from talking about her autistic daughter and remember to say “my daughter with autism”.  Nobody says “my son with homosexuality” or “my friend with Judaism”.    To me it makes sense to refer to people in the way they wish to be referred to – if some autistic people prefer to call themselves and be called “people with autism” that is their prerogative – but referring to the rest of us as autistic people, and accepting autism as a neurology that adds to the richness of human diversity will help create a more accepting culture, which can only be good for everyone.

*
Not his real name – he’s shy – true story though.
** Since writing this the National Autistic Society has done a survey on language confirming that autistic people prefer to be called autistic people, and is in the process of updating its language use.


11 Comments

    Categories

    All
    Communication
    Diagnosis
    Disability
    Empathy
    Employment
    Language
    Masking
    Neurodiversity
    Non Verbal Communication
    Non-verbal Communication
    Sensory Issues
    Socialising
    Stigma
    Support
    Theory Of Mind
    Therapy
    Women

    Get Updates

    Blog posts in alphabetical order of titles


    Autism -  ordinary or extraordinary?
    
    
    Autistic people can be social


    Autistic women, do we even exist?

    Autism and social skills

    Difference, disability or Gucci diagnosis?

    Context or content?

    Does language affect our attitudes to autism?

    Everybody has an autism spectrum condition

    Is everyone a bit autistic?

    Mild autism?

    Sensory Issues

    The A Word, drama with explicit autism

    To mask, or not to mask, that is the question.

    The S word (stigma)

    What do we do with effective support?

    What you want always wanted to know about autism but were afraid to ask

    Who are the autism experts?

    Who decides if I'm autistic?

    Who or what is TOM and what does he or it have to do with autism?

    Why quicker diagnosis of autism is useful now, but hopefully won’t be needed in future


    Other blogs

    Autism age. Incisive blog by Cos Michael who specailises in autism and aging.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2020
    August 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    April 2018
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    September 2015
    May 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013

get updates
Picture